Iran's permanent representative to the IAEA, Kazem Gharibabadi, tweeted that Natanz expected uranium enriched to 60% in a week.
That was in April. Recall that the International Atomic Energy Agency cited only 4.5% purity at Natanz less than a year ago. (Weapons-grade uranium has 90% purity, by the way.) Tehran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Gharibabadi's tweet noted uranium enriched to 60% "will improve significantly... the quality and quantity of radiopharmaceutical products." [Emphasis mine.] USP describes itself as a scientific nonprofit that works for the global availability of safe and useful medicine. It notes the use of radiopharmaceuticals (radioactive drugs) in medical treatment, therapy, and diagnoses. On the question of nuclear weapons, 9 confirmed nations have them, including Iran's nemeses the United States and Israel. I don't support nuclear weapons for any nation, least of all the nine who have them. Nor do I support the ambition to develop them. In Dark Skies, geopolitical scientist Daniel Deudney describes the human death toll if one were deployed: "One nuclear weapon, an object roughly the size of a... household refrigerator, can obliterate a large city and kill millions of people." Altogether, Russia and the United States have more than 11,000 of these refrigerators. I'm not sure if Iran has nuclear ambitions, but I'm wary until I get more perspective. For instance: What's the average level of enrichment for radiopharmaceuticals? And if 60% purity will enhance "significantly" Iran's radiopharmaceuticals, why then did it sacrifice production to just 4 percent (3.67) under the nuclear deal?
A comment on "Iran Hopes to Get 60% Uranium Next Week, Envoy in Vienna Says" (G. Arancibia)
Jubalyn ExWilliams lives in Pennsylvania (United States). You'll find her writings and at times interpretation of basic data, like those inspired by G. Arancibia's "Iran Hopes to Get 60% Uranium Next Week, Envoy in Vienna Says," at landturn.com/blog.
Related: "Cybersecurity and Cyberwar" (2020)
Related: Why satellite more useful than WiFi to fight kidnapping in Nigeria (2021) Related: Why the first airstrike under Biden was sloppy (2021) Related: "The Incendiaries" (Kwon) (2019) Related: How barrier to Stein as a viable presidential candidate is man-made (2024) Related: One way COVID could force economic depression on African nations (2020)
0 Comments
Note: The following is only an excerpt. A redacted copy of the full email is downloadable at your own risk. My husband and I have been the subject of repeat and persistent mail theft for 13 months. There's no indication that the other tenants have been subjected to such theft. The building has only 10 residential units -- half of them occupied. It's also equipped with video surveillance. The residence is <Redacted> | Harrisburg, PA | XXXXX. Known incidents and categories of mail are as follows: Sometime between April 27, 2020 and April 28, 2020 (Tuesday) Before 9 a.m. on April 28
February 19, 2021 to March 10, 2021 (Daily)
Related: Alert (2021)
Related: Living under new management (2021) Related: The circumstance among "millennials" I think gave rise to the "sharing economy" (2019) Related: Raising my eyebrows @ recent U.S. unemployment claims post-2009 (2021) Related: Census Takers contribute more to COVID well-being than "Stay Home" messages (2020) Please join the #CheyneyChallenge, a monthly donation campaign for America's first HBCU. I made my most recent donation of $18.37 today. Cheyney University of Pennsylvania cheyney.edu Est. 1837 The Cheyney Challenge is an initiative of alumnus Mr. Bright. I committed to it in 2015, and began donating the following year. Related: April Cheyney Challenge (2021)
Related: May Cheyney Challenge (2020) Related: May Cheyney Challenge (2021) Related: May Cheyney Challenge (2022) Related: May Cheyney Challenge (2023) OneTrust Certified Privacy Professional Jubalyn ExWilliams lives in Pennsylvania (United States). You can reach her on her website at landturn.com/contact. Related: "Weapons of Math Destruction" (O'Neil) (2020)
Related: No, your IP address isn't private info (2021) Related: Cybersecurity: final project (2021) Related: Ecosia over Google (2020) Related: Data privacy law would upgrade Congress to the 21st Century (2024) Related: Google: The for-profit public library (2020)
... I don't believe it's a violation of data privacy. ... IP addresses are assigned to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and large networks -- not individuals like you and me. They, in turn, grant us these addresses so we can get online. However, IP addresses aren't unique to our computers or mobile phones. The address changes when we use a different network, such as an internet cafe; a university; or a workplace.
A reply to a response in "Looking up IP Addresses" (coursera.org)
Jubalyn ExWilliams lives in Pennsylvania (United States). You can find her writings and commentaries, including one on her course post "Looking up IP Addresses" on Coursera, at landturn.com/blog.
Related: OneTrust Privacy Professional (Quiz) (Notes)
Related: "Weapons of Math Destruction" (2020) Related: "Cybersecurity and Cyberwar" (2020) Related: Cybersecurity: final project (Assignment) Related: Ecosia over Google (2020) |
Archives
June 2024
|