Note: I can't vouch for the factuality of the individual's claims here; only that they were claims he made at the time. Passages about the corridor were added on June 29.
Two weeks ago today, the individual left a mutual site three minutes after I did (per security footage). It was Monday during the 06:00 hour.
Eventually, he arrived at the establishment in the vehicle below. He then divided most of his time between smoking at his car outside and sitting down inside.
Later, as I gathered my belongings to leave, the individual left his own unattended and rushed to his car outside. I hurried out of the building via a different exit and rounded the block...
... in the opposite direction.
Per security footage, the individual returned to the very first site minutes before my return on foot. Maintaining a physical barrier behind a door, I demanded he stop following me.
And that I want none of his attention.
Among other things, he said he's also been through a divorce. That he has a car. "Do you?" And that he, too, works in IT -- namely, for a hotel.
Until that moment, I avoided talking to him. And on a few successful occasions I cracked the door open to deter him from standing in the immediate corridor any longer. However, without a peep hole or security camera at the time, I stayed behind the closed door while he'd linger multiple times as I worked alone at night.
Prior to the May 9 altercation above, the last deterrance was March 1. At the time, he waited about 5 minutes for someone to return an item he'd forgotten. After receiving it, he remained in the immediate corridor for another several minutes.
I cracked the door open.
"Oh, I'm sorry," he said, and kept it moving.
About 4-feet wide (1.22 meters), the corridor accommodates adults of average weight/height if walking behind each other (in the same direction) or passing each other one at a time (from opposite directions).
Two weeks prior to the May 9 altercation, the individual left the site 5-to-10 minutes after I did. Outside, he encountered police responding to the location. It was the 05:00 hour.
Wearing a workman's uniform for a different hotel, he volunteered to officers that he's waiting for an Uber. If to the hotel on his uniform, then it was a 15-minute walk away.
Ironically, it was his employment status for which he first announced himself about six months ago. During an organizational meeting on Zoom, I provided a personal update as is the routine among fellow members. It included a few life-changing events, including a divorce and a new job.
The individual, who was not part of the meeting, entered the immediate corridor.
"I don't have a job and I don't care," he said.
At any rate, I want no contact with this person and none of his attention.
Related: Environmental Committee (April 2022)
Note: According to Britannica, special prosecutors are currently referred to as independent counsel.
Sorry we missed you last night.
Richard L. Weiss, Green candidate for U.S. Senate, joined me for an hour-long impromptu interview. You might know that Weiss' first priority as senator would be #MedicareForAll. Here are two you might not:
End the bipartisan ballot. Please contact the Green Party of Pennsylvania (https://facebook.com/gpofpa) to petition your network for some of the 5,000 signatures needed to get Richard, P.K., and Michael Badges-Canning on the November ballot.
A post about my interview with PA candidate Richard L. Weiss for U.S. Senate (Capital Area Green Party)
Please join the #CheyneyChallenge, a monthly donation campaign for America's first HBCU. I made my most recent donation of $18.37 today.
Cheyney University of Pennsylvania
The Cheyney Challenge is an initiative of alumnus Mr. Bright. I committed to it in 2015, and began donating the following year.