|
Biology is not my expertise or background of knowledge. I did, though, note the oncology professor and director, [Mary] Armanios, of The Johns Hopkins Telomere Center, who said, "telomere length has a continuous range that is normal at every age." And that "small additions and subtractions" -- at minimum -- "may not be biologically meaningful."
That considered, this report on the VITAL study suggests that Vitamin D supplementation could serve as one protectant of telomeres -- at least those in the white blood cells of some populations age 50+. So even when telomere length is a questionable biomarker, does it negate that healthy supplementation with Vitamin D was beneficial in the non-control group? Vitamin D aside, I'm a little surprised -- given the popularity of their tout in human nutrition and well-being -- that Omega 3 supplementation had no comparable effect. Mass General Brigham and the Medical College of Georgia conducted the VITAL study.
An FB post via Cryonics Institute on "This Vitamin May Slow Aging Process--New Research," v24May2025 (D. Taheri)
Jubalyn ExWilliams lives in Pennsylvania (United States). You can find her writings and commentary, including "What I didn't expect from Omega 3 in telomere study," at landturn.com/blog.
Related: "Unleash the Power of Vitamin D (Matthews) (2024)
Related: Living longer with health problems (2022) Related: "Medical Racism" documentary (2021) Related: Boost your brain with fresh air (2020) Related: Japan: The world's oldest population (2019) Related: "The Price We Pay" (Makary) (2020) Related: Census Takers do more for COVID well-being than "Stay Home" messages (2020) Related: CoVID-19, II (2020) Related: Why Americans appear to have an obesity advantage (2023) Related: What interests me 1st about a successful animal-to-human kidney transplant (2024)
0 Comments
|
Archives
October 2025
|



